
GeForce GTX 680
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 680
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100.4% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅113.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 324.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 680
2012GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅113.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 324.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100.4% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GeForce GTX 680?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 680 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 680
GeForce GTX 680
The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 680 scores 5,609 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 112%. The GeForce GTX 680 is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1058 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,609 | 11,892+112% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2560+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.25 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+176% |
| Boost Clock | 1058 MHz | 1755 MHz+66% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 2.5 MB+1823% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 680 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 680 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192.2 GB/s (GeForce GTX 680) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 16.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 224 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 680) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 680) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680 draws 195W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 40% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 680) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 256mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 98°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 195W | 130W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 450W-18% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 256mm | 235mm |
| Height | 111mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 98°C | 75°C-23% |
| Perf/Watt | 28.8 | 91.5+218% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 680 launched at $499 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 50.1% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 326.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $249-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.2 | 47.8+327% |
| Codename | GK104 | GA106 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #410 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













