
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 235mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,749 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌180.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+35.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 281.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
CMP 40HX
2021GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 235mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+35.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 281.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,749 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌180.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than CMP 40HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is CMP 40HX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 40HX scores 8,749 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 35.9%. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (CMP 40HX) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 288 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749 | 11,892+36% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 1755 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+80% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 2.5 MB+9% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36+80% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+260% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 40HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: No vs 5th Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | No | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 34.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 130W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 235mm |
| Height | 111mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 91.5+93% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 64.4% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 282.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $249-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 47.8+282% |
| Codename | TU106 | GA106 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #302 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













