G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000E Ada Generation across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

2024

Why buy it

✅5.0% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)

2016

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

2024

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅5.0% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000E Ada Generation across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 2000E Ada Generation better than GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)?

Yes. RTX 2000E Ada Generation is clearly the better overall GPU here. RTX 2000E Ada Generation averages 5.0% more FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 15,252 vs 15,614 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTX 2000E Ada Generation is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) is a 2016 model from an older high-end class with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016, more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 8 GB, better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 16nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX 2000E Ada Generation can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $999 MSRP. RTX 2000E Ada Generation is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. RTX 2000E Ada Generation is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $999 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 5.0% more estimated average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (15,252 vs 15,614). Moving to $999 MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (70W vs 150W), and DLSS Super Resolution.

Is GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. RTX 2000E Ada Generation is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and DLSS Super Resolution.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) Benchmark Check

RTX 2000E Ada Generation Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
1080p
low	156 FPS	199 FPS
medium	138 FPS	184 FPS
high	122 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	180 FPS
medium	106 FPS	155 FPS
high	94 FPS	130 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	119 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	113 FPS
medium	65 FPS	99 FPS
high	52 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	68 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)Open RTX 2000E Ada Generation

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
1080p
low	312 FPS	342 FPS
medium	262 FPS	285 FPS
high	197 FPS	217 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	170 FPS
1440p
low	202 FPS	212 FPS
medium	172 FPS	181 FPS
high	139 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	120 FPS
4K
low	106 FPS	109 FPS
medium	88 FPS	90 FPS
high	73 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	59 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)Open RTX 2000E Ada Generation

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
1080p
low	703 FPS	686 FPS
medium	562 FPS	549 FPS
high	468 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	343 FPS
1440p
low	527 FPS	456 FPS
medium	422 FPS	385 FPS
high	351 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	263 FPS	257 FPS
4K
low	351 FPS	335 FPS
medium	281 FPS	274 FPS
high	234 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	163 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)Open RTX 2000E Ada Generation

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
1080p
low	446 FPS	617 FPS
medium	386 FPS	538 FPS
high	319 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	271 FPS	343 FPS
1440p
low	364 FPS	507 FPS
medium	311 FPS	412 FPS
high	234 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	257 FPS
4K
low	201 FPS	311 FPS
medium	170 FPS	275 FPS
high	148 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	172 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)Open RTX 2000E Ada Generation

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) and RTX 2000E Ada Generation

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)

The GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 15 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1771 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,614 points. Launch price was $499.99.

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) scores 15,614 and the RTX 2000E Ada Generation reaches 15,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Raw compute: 9.068 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1771 MHz vs 2130 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score	15,614+2%	15,252
Architecture	Pascal	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	16 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2560	2816+10%
Compute (TFLOPS)	9.068 TFLOPS	12 TFLOPS+32%
Boost Clock	1771 MHz	2130 MHz+20%
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	160+82%	88
L1 Cache	0.94 MB	2.8 MB+198%
L2 Cache	2 MB	12 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX 2000E Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has 16 GB. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs 224 GB/s (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — a 42.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel). Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	320 GB/s+43%	224 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	12 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
DirectX	12.0	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Encoder	NVENC 5.0	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP8	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) draws 150W versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 167mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
TDP	150W	70W-53%
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	167mm
Height	0mm	68mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	104.1	217.9+109%