
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅45.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 182.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 285W vs 165W.
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 285W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌25.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅45.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 182.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 285W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 285W vs 165W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌25.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than RadeonT RX 6850M XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RadeonT RX 6850M XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 157 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RadeonT RX 6850M XT

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RadeonT RX 6850M XT's 13,992 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 125.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 40 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+126% | 13,992 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+200% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+203% | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+1% | 2581 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+50% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+1400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1500% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+50% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of video memory. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3 MB (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1500% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RadeonT RX 6850M XT's 165W — a 53.3% difference. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 165W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+31% | 84.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 20.1% less ($201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 14.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 182.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-20% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+182% | 14.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 22 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #11 | #103 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












