
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Popular choices:

RadeonT 780M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
2016Why buy it
- ✅28.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 470 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
2016RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅28.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 470 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RadeonT 780M better than Radeon RX 470 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 470 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 59 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 470 (móvel) and RadeonT 780M

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1074 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points. Launch price was $549.99.

RadeonT 780M
RadeonT 780M
The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) scores 7,000 and the RadeonT 780M reaches 7,098 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 4.399 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 1074 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,000 | 7,098+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.399 TFLOPS | 8.909 TFLOPS+103% |
| Boost Clock | 1074 MHz | 2900 MHz+170% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) draws 85W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 140% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 15W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 82.4 | 473.2+474% |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT 780M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179 | — |
| Codename | Ellesmere | Phoenix |
| Release | August 4 2016 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #360 | #359 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












