GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) vs Radeon 760M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

2017

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) better than Radeon 760M?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 5,800 vs 5,449 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is a 2017 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon 760M is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 760M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2017, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 6.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 760M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 75W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 760M make more sense than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)?

Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 75W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel). The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) currently gives you 6.4% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) Benchmark Check

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	93 FPS	46 FPS
medium	83 FPS	29 FPS
high	70 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	32 FPS
medium	74 FPS	19 FPS
high	60 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	39 FPS	12 FPS
medium	37 FPS	8 FPS
high	26 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)Open Radeon 760M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	127 FPS	91 FPS
medium	91 FPS	64 FPS
high	71 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	30 FPS
1440p
low	66 FPS	58 FPS
medium	48 FPS	38 FPS
high	32 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	22 FPS	21 FPS
4K
low	25 FPS	30 FPS
medium	17 FPS	21 FPS
high	13 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	9 FPS	11 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)Open Radeon 760M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	261 FPS	245 FPS
medium	209 FPS	196 FPS
high	174 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	196 FPS	184 FPS
medium	157 FPS	147 FPS
high	130 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	123 FPS
medium	104 FPS	98 FPS
high	87 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)Open Radeon 760M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	261 FPS	154 FPS
medium	197 FPS	120 FPS
high	174 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	196 FPS	109 FPS
medium	156 FPS	87 FPS
high	130 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	65 FPS
medium	82 FPS	52 FPS
high	72 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)Open Radeon 760M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) and Radeon 760M

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,800 points.

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) scores 5,800 versus the Radeon 760M's 5,449 — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) leads by 6.4%. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 2.488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 2599 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)	Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score	5,800+6%	5,449
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	14 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	768+50%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.488 TFLOPS	5.323 TFLOPS+114%
Boost Clock	1620 MHz	2599 MHz+60%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	48+50%	32
L1 Cache	288 KB+125%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 760M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)	Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)	Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)	Radeon 760M
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)	Radeon 760M
Encoder	NVENC (6th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (3rd Gen)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) draws 75W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.