
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon VII
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 73.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 295W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 280mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon VII across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon VII
2019Why buy it
- ✅45.9% more average FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌180.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌63.9% higher power demand at 295W vs 180W.
- ❌61.8% longer card at 280mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon VII
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 73.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 295W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 280mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅45.9% more average FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon VII across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌180.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌63.9% higher power demand at 295W vs 180W.
- ❌61.8% longer card at 280mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon VII better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 69 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 489 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 440 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 183 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 596 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 183 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon VII

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon VII
Radeon VII
The Radeon VII is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 7 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1750 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,308 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon VII's 16,308 — the Radeon VII leads by 62%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon VII uses GCN 5.1, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3,840 (Radeon VII). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 13.44 TFLOPS (Radeon VII). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1750 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon VII |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 16,308+62% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3840+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 13.44 TFLOPS+51% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB | 960 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon VII relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon VII |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon VII has 16 GB. The Radeon VII offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1024 GB/s (Radeon VII) — a 433.3% advantage for the Radeon VII. Bus width: 192-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Radeon VII) — the Radeon VII has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon VII |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+433% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 4096-bit+2033% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Radeon VII). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon VII |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon VII). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon VII).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon VII |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon VII's 295W — a 48.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 750W (Radeon VII). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon VII |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-39% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-47% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 280mm |
| Height | 111mm | 125mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 89°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+1% | 55.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon VII launched at $699. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 64.4% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 23.3 (Radeon VII) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 73.4% better value. The Radeon VII is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon VII |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-64% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+73% | 23.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | Vega 20 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | February 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #137 | #125 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













