
GRID P40-12Q
Popular choices:

Radeon TM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P40-12Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.
Radeon TM
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
GRID P40-12Q
2015Radeon TM
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon TM better than GRID P40-12Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID P40-12Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-12Q and Radeon TM

GRID P40-12Q
GRID P40-12Q
The GRID P40-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,540 points.

Radeon TM
Radeon TM
The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-12Q scores 5,540 and the Radeon TM reaches 5,564 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-12Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-12Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-12Q) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,540 | 5,564 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 5.939 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 2900 MHz+146% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-12Q draws 225W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 175% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-12Q) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 24.6 | 370.9+1408% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon TM is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | Strix Point |
| Release | August 30 2015 | July 15 2024 |
| Ranking | #433 | #312 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












