
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon TM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅51.7% more average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.
Radeon TM
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon TM
2024Why buy it
- ✅51.7% more average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon TM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon TM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon TM

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon TM
Radeon TM
The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon TM's 5,564 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 93.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16 (Radeon TM) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+93% | 5,564 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+125% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+14% | 5.939 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2900 MHz+97% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72+13% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+820% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18+13% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon TM relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 129.4% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 15W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 370.9+141% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












