GeForce MX570 vs Radeon TM

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce MX570

2022

Why buy it

✅3.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon TM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.

Radeon TM

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

GeForce MX570

2022

Radeon TM

2024

Why buy it

✅3.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon TM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce MX570 better than Radeon TM?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. GeForce MX570 averages 3.6% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,738 vs 5,564 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce MX570 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon TM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce MX570 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $150 MSRP. GeForce MX570 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce MX570 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $150 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 3.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.1% higher G3D Mark. Radeon TM is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 25W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon TM make more sense than GeForce MX570?

Yes. Radeon TM is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 25W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce MX570. The trade-off is that GeForce MX570 currently gives you 3.1% higher G3D Mark and 3.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce MX570 Benchmark Check

Radeon TM Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce MX570	Radeon TM
1080p
low	81 FPS	93 FPS
medium	69 FPS	78 FPS
high	56 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	71 FPS	80 FPS
medium	62 FPS	68 FPS
high	44 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	26 FPS	30 FPS
medium	24 FPS	28 FPS
high	16 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 Open Radeon TM

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce MX570	Radeon TM
1080p
low	160 FPS	126 FPS
medium	129 FPS	88 FPS
high	99 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	118 FPS	90 FPS
medium	91 FPS	60 FPS
high	71 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	38 FPS
medium	54 FPS	28 FPS
high	42 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 Open Radeon TM

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce MX570	Radeon TM
1080p
low	258 FPS	250 FPS
medium	207 FPS	200 FPS
high	172 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	125 FPS
1440p
low	194 FPS	188 FPS
medium	155 FPS	150 FPS
high	129 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	129 FPS	125 FPS
medium	103 FPS	100 FPS
high	86 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	60 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 Open Radeon TM

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce MX570	Radeon TM
1080p
low	137 FPS	172 FPS
medium	113 FPS	135 FPS
high	95 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	89 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	118 FPS
medium	86 FPS	96 FPS
high	73 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	64 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	71 FPS
medium	49 FPS	56 FPS
high	39 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	33 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 Open Radeon TM

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 and Radeon TM

GeForce MX570

The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

Radeon TM

The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 and the Radeon TM reaches 5,564 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570) vs 16 (Radeon TM) with 64 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce MX570	Radeon TM
G3D Mark Score	5,738+3%	5,564
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	8 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	2048+100%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS	5.939 TFLOPS+26%
Boost Clock	1155 MHz	2900 MHz+151%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	64	64
L1 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	16	16

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX570 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon TM relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce MX570	Radeon TM
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce MX570	Radeon TM
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 50% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.