
GeForce GTX 970M
Popular choices:

Radeon TM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 970M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌440% higher power demand at 81W vs 15W.
Radeon TM
2024Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 81W, a 66W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 970M
2014Radeon TM
2024Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 81W, a 66W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌440% higher power demand at 81W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 970M better than Radeon TM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon TM make more sense than GeForce GTX 970M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970M and Radeon TM

GeForce GTX 970M
GeForce GTX 970M
The GeForce GTX 970M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,705 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.

Radeon TM
Radeon TM
The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 970M scores 5,705 and the Radeon TM reaches 5,564 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970M) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970M) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,705+3% | 5,564 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+25% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.657 TFLOPS | 5.939 TFLOPS+124% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 2900 MHz+179% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB+88% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 970M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon TM relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 970M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM has 4 GB. The Radeon TM offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 970M) vs 2 MB (Radeon TM) — the Radeon TM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970M draws 81W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 137.5% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970M) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970M | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 81W | 15W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 70.4 | 370.9+427% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













