FirePro D300 vs Radeon TM

FirePro D300

2014Core: 850 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon TM

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro D300

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.

Radeon TM

2024

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro D300 better than Radeon TM?
Yes. FirePro D300 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 5,722 vs 5,564 in G3D Mark. On top of that, FirePro D300 is a 2014 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon TM is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon TM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2014, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
FirePro D300 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $500 MSRP. FirePro D300 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. FirePro D300 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $500 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.8% higher G3D Mark. Radeon TM is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 150W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon TM make more sense than FirePro D300?
Yes. Radeon TM is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 150W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of FirePro D300. The trade-off is that FirePro D300 currently gives you 2.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro D300Radeon TM
1080p
low103 FPS93 FPS
medium88 FPS78 FPS
high71 FPS65 FPS
ultra42 FPS43 FPS
1440p
low90 FPS80 FPS
medium77 FPS68 FPS
high56 FPS51 FPS
ultra32 FPS32 FPS
4K
low28 FPS30 FPS
medium27 FPS28 FPS
high18 FPS19 FPS
ultra15 FPS17 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro D300Radeon TM
1080p
low158 FPS126 FPS
medium118 FPS88 FPS
high85 FPS63 FPS
ultra57 FPS45 FPS
1440p
low106 FPS90 FPS
medium74 FPS60 FPS
high56 FPS44 FPS
ultra40 FPS32 FPS
4K
low52 FPS38 FPS
medium37 FPS28 FPS
high30 FPS22 FPS
ultra20 FPS15 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro D300Radeon TM
1080p
low257 FPS250 FPS
medium206 FPS200 FPS
high172 FPS167 FPS
ultra129 FPS125 FPS
1440p
low193 FPS188 FPS
medium154 FPS150 FPS
high129 FPS125 FPS
ultra97 FPS94 FPS
4K
low129 FPS125 FPS
medium103 FPS100 FPS
high86 FPS83 FPS
ultra64 FPS60 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro D300Radeon TM
1080p
low180 FPS172 FPS
medium146 FPS135 FPS
high128 FPS112 FPS
ultra99 FPS89 FPS
1440p
low126 FPS118 FPS
medium104 FPS96 FPS
high92 FPS81 FPS
ultra67 FPS64 FPS
4K
low73 FPS71 FPS
medium56 FPS56 FPS
high45 FPS44 FPS
ultra31 FPS33 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro D300 and Radeon TM

AMD

FirePro D300

The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

AMD

Radeon TM

The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro D300 scores 5,722 and the Radeon TM reaches 5,564 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D300 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM).

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon TM
G3D Mark Score
5,722+3%
5,564
Architecture
GCN 1.0
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1280+25%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.176 TFLOPS
5.939 TFLOPS+173%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80+25%
64
L1 Cache
320 KB+25%
256 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon TM
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro D300) vs 2 MB (Radeon TM) — the Radeon TM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon TM
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon TM
TDP
150W
15W-90%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
38.1
370.9+873%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon TM is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon TM
MSRP
$500
Codename
Pitcairn
Strix Point
Release
January 18 2014
July 15 2024
Ranking
#506
#312