
Radeon HD 7870
Popular choices:

Radeon Sky 500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 7870
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 38.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Radeon Sky 500
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌43.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 13.1 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7870
2012Radeon Sky 500
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 38.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌43.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 13.1 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Sky 500 better than Radeon HD 7870?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon HD 7870 make more sense than Radeon Sky 500?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7870 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7870 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 7870 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 7870 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7870 and Radeon Sky 500

Radeon HD 7870
Radeon HD 7870
The Radeon HD 7870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,568 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Sky 500
Radeon Sky 500
The Radeon Sky 500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7870 scores 4,568 and the Radeon Sky 500 reaches 4,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7870 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Sky 500 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 7870) vs 1,280 (Radeon Sky 500). Raw compute: 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7870) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (Radeon Sky 500).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7870 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,568 | 4,723+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.56 TFLOPS+5% | 2.432 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7870 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7870 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7870 draws 200W versus the Radeon Sky 500's 150W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon Sky 500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 7870) vs 350W (Radeon Sky 500). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7870 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 150W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.8 | 31.5+38% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7870 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Sky 500 launched at $500. The Radeon HD 7870 costs 30.2% less ($151 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.1 (Radeon HD 7870) vs 9.4 (Radeon Sky 500) — the Radeon HD 7870 offers 39.4% better value. The Radeon Sky 500 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7870 | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-30% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.1+39% | 9.4 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Pitcairn |
| Release | March 5 2012 | March 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #460 | #455 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













