Quadro M2200 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

CPU

GPU

Quadro M2200

2017Core: 695 MHzBoost: 1036 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

2020Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2105 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro M2200

4 GB 55

4,294

+1.6%

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

4,225

0.0%

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

Radeon RX 6650M XT

Radeon RX 6800

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro M2200

2017

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 250W, a 195W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
11.1% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$450 MSRP

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro M2200: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro M2200 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌354.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 55W.

Quadro M2200

2017

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

2020

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 250W, a 195W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro M2200: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro M2200 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
11.1% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$450 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌354.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro M2200 better than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U?

Yes. Quadro M2200 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 4,294 vs 4,225 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro M2200 is a 2017 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is a 2020 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro M2200 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro M2200 is about 11.1% more expensive on MSRP at $500 MSRP versus $450 MSRP, and you are getting 1.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U make more sense than Quadro M2200?

Yes. Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $450 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro M2200. The trade-off is that Quadro M2200 currently gives you 1.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M2200 Benchmark Check

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro M2200	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
1080p
low	78 FPS	130 FPS
medium	66 FPS	118 FPS
high	53 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	85 FPS
1440p
low	68 FPS	107 FPS
medium	59 FPS	91 FPS
high	41 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	67 FPS
4K
low	24 FPS	60 FPS
medium	23 FPS	54 FPS
high	15 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	40 FPS

Open Quadro M2200 Open Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro M2200	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
1080p
low	79 FPS	190 FPS
medium	56 FPS	152 FPS
high	44 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	45 FPS	143 FPS
medium	29 FPS	114 FPS
high	22 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	17 FPS	95 FPS
medium	11 FPS	76 FPS
high	9 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	48 FPS

Open Quadro M2200 Open Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro M2200	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
1080p
low	193 FPS	190 FPS
medium	155 FPS	152 FPS
high	129 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	145 FPS	143 FPS
medium	116 FPS	114 FPS
high	97 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	97 FPS	95 FPS
medium	77 FPS	76 FPS
high	64 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	48 FPS

Open Quadro M2200 Open Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro M2200	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
1080p
low	143 FPS	190 FPS
medium	112 FPS	152 FPS
high	95 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	143 FPS
medium	84 FPS	114 FPS
high	71 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	61 FPS	95 FPS
medium	46 FPS	76 FPS
high	36 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	48 FPS

Open Quadro M2200 Open Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2200 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

Quadro M2200

The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,225 points. Launch price was $579.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M2200 scores 4,294 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U reaches 4,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2200 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro M2200) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Raw compute: 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Boost clocks: 1036 MHz vs 2105 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M2200	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
G3D Mark Score	4,294+2%	4,225
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1024	3840+275%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.122 TFLOPS	16.17 TFLOPS+662%
Boost Clock	1036 MHz	2105 MHz+103%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	64	240+275%
L1 Cache	384 KB	768 KB+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M2200	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M2200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has 2 GB. The Quadro M2200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2200) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M2200	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2200 draws 55W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U's 250W — a 127.9% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2200) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro M2200	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
TDP	55W-78%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	78.1+362%	16.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M2200 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U launched at $450. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U costs 10% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (Quadro M2200) vs 9.4 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U offers 9.3% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).