
Quadro K4200
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro K4200
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 108W instead of 250W, a 142W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
2020Why buy it
- ✅82.2% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro K4200: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro K4200 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌131.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 108W.
Quadro K4200
2014Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
2020Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 108W instead of 250W, a 142W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅82.2% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro K4200: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro K4200 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌131.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 108W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U better than Quadro K4200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro K4200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro K4200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro K4200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 17 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 48 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro K4200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 48 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro K4200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K4200 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200
The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,225 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K4200 scores 4,332 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U reaches 4,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K4200) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Raw compute: 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Boost clocks: 784 MHz vs 2105 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,332+3% | 4,225 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344 | 3840+186% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.107 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS+667% |
| Boost Clock | 784 MHz | 2105 MHz+168% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 112 | 240+114% |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 768 KB+586% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K4200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has 2 GB. The Quadro K4200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K4200) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K4200 draws 108W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U's 250W — a 79.3% difference. The Quadro K4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4200) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 108W-57% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 40.1+137% | 16.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K4200 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U launched at $450. The Quadro K4200 costs 100+% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro K4200) vs 9.4 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Quadro K4200 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 9.4 |
| Codename | GK104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #475 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













