
GeForce GTX 480
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 480
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌10.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 480: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 480 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 480
2010Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 480: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 480 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌10.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U better than GeForce GTX 480?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 480 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 48 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 48 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 480 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

GeForce GTX 480
GeForce GTX 480
The GeForce GTX 480 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,075 points. Launch price was $499.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,225 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 480 scores 4,075 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U reaches 4,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 480 is built on Fermi while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Raw compute: 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,075 | 4,225+4% |
| Architecture | Fermi | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 3840+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.345 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS+1102% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 60 | 240+300% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+25% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4 MB+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 480 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 480 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has 2 GB. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 480) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB | 2 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4 MB+433% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 480 draws 250W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U's 250W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 480) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | None |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 16.3 | 16.9+4% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 480 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U launched at $450. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U costs 9.8% less ($49 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.2 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 9.4 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U offers 14.6% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $450-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2 | 9.4+15% |
| Codename | GF100 | Navi 21 |
| Release | March 26 2010 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #488 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













