
FirePro W9000
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro W9000
2012Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌566.5% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ❌174% higher power demand at 274W vs 100W.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,399 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 550.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 274W, a 174W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
FirePro W9000
2012Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,399 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 550.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 274W, a 174W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌566.5% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ❌174% higher power demand at 274W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro W9000 better than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS make more sense than FirePro W9000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W9000 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

FirePro W9000
FirePro W9000
The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS reaches 6,012 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,157+2% | 6,012 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.994 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+115% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS has 4 GB. The FirePro W9000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS's 100W — a 93% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 100W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 93°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 60.1+167% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W9000 launched at $3999 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS launched at $600. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS costs 85% less ($3399 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (FirePro W9000) vs 10.0 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS offers 566.7% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | $600-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | 10.0+567% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Navi 23 |
| Release | June 14 2012 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #390 | #135 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













