
Arc Graphics 130T
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc Graphics 130T
2025Why buy it
- β Costs $300 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- β Delivers 106.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- β Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βLimited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Why buy it
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020β2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020β2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β100% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- β566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
Arc Graphics 130T
2025Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Why buy it
- β Costs $300 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- β Delivers 106.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- β Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020β2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020β2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βLimited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- β100% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- β566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Arc Graphics 130T better than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS make more sense than Arc Graphics 130T?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130T and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

Arc Graphics 130T
Arc Graphics 130T
The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS reaches 6,012 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS uses RDNA 2.0. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208+3% | 6,012 |
| Architecture | Xe+ | RDNA 2.0 |
| Shading Units | 7 | 2048+29157% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS has 4 GB. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS's 100W β a 147.8% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-85% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 85Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 413.9+589% | 60.1 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 130T launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS launched at $600. The Arc Graphics 130T costs 50% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 10.0 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) β the Arc Graphics 130T offers 107% better value. The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-50% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7+107% | 10.0 |
| Codename | β | Navi 23 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #386 | #135 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














