
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+550.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 62.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 24.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $599 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,852 vs 31,578).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.3 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
2020Why buy it
- ✅+550.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 62.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 24.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $599 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,852 vs 31,578).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.3 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H's 4,852 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 550.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2105 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 60 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+551% | 4,852 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+100% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+148% | 16.17 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+24% | 2105 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 240 | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+900% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 60 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H's 250W — a 13.1% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 250W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 285mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+471% | 19.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H launched at $200. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H costs 75% less ($599 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 24.3 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 62.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $200-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+63% | 24.3 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #11 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













