
Radeon Pro 560
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 132W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌42.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌76% higher power demand at 132W vs 75W.
Radeon Pro 560
2017Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 132W, a 57W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌42.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌76% higher power demand at 132W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 560 better than Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H make more sense than Radeon Pro 560?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 39 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H

Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 560
The Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,475 points.


Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2491 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,448 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 560 scores 3,475 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H reaches 3,448 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 560 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560) vs 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560) vs 8.928 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,475 | 3,448 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1792+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.858 TFLOPS | 8.928 TFLOPS+381% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H) — the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 560 draws 75W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H's 132W — a 55.1% difference. The Radeon Pro 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 560) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-43% | 132W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 46.3+77% | 26.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 560 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H launched at $350. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H costs 30% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.0 (Radeon Pro 560) vs 9.9 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H) — the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H offers 41.4% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $350-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0 | 9.9+41% |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | Navi 23 |
| Release | April 18 2017 | October 13 2021 |
| Ranking | #543 | #150 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













