
Radeon Pro WX 4150
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 5 150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro WX 4150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.8 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌16.7% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 4150
2017Radeon Ryzen 5 150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.8 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌16.7% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 4150 better than Radeon Ryzen 5 150?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Ryzen 5 150 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 23 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Radeon Ryzen 5 150

Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.


Radeon Ryzen 5 150
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 scores 2,642 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 reaches 2,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 512 (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Raw compute: 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Boost clocks: 1053 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,642+2% | 2,595 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+75% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.887 TFLOPS+56% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | 1183 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+75% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB+75% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Ryzen 5 150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 draws 50W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 150's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8+2% | 51.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 launched at $350. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 costs 14.3% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 7.4 (Radeon Ryzen 5 150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 18.9% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-14% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.8+19% | 7.4 |
| Codename | Baffin | Lexa |
| Release | March 1 2017 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #620 | #617 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













