MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Ryzen 5 150

NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012Core: 620 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Ryzen 5 150

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon Ryzen 5 150

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M better than Radeon Ryzen 5 150?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 2,637 vs 2,595 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $350 MSRP, and you are getting 1.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Ryzen 5 150 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon Ryzen 5 150 make more sense than MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M?
Yes. Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 100W), and staying closer to $350 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M. The trade-off is that MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M currently gives you 1.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Ryzen 5 150 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Ryzen 5 150
1080p
low51 FPS47 FPS
medium41 FPS28 FPS
high25 FPS20 FPS
ultra15 FPS10 FPS
1440p
low28 FPS31 FPS
medium21 FPS18 FPS
high12 FPS10 FPS
ultra7 FPS5 FPS
4K
low11 FPS10 FPS
medium9 FPS7 FPS
high5 FPS4 FPS
ultra5 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Ryzen 5 150
1080p
low94 FPS117 FPS
medium73 FPS93 FPS
high60 FPS78 FPS
ultra42 FPS54 FPS
1440p
low56 FPS84 FPS
medium40 FPS63 FPS
high31 FPS49 FPS
ultra23 FPS34 FPS
4K
low23 FPS43 FPS
medium16 FPS32 FPS
high13 FPS26 FPS
ultra9 FPS17 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Ryzen 5 150
1080p
low119 FPS117 FPS
medium95 FPS93 FPS
high79 FPS78 FPS
ultra59 FPS58 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS88 FPS
medium71 FPS70 FPS
high59 FPS58 FPS
ultra44 FPS44 FPS
4K
low59 FPS58 FPS
medium47 FPS47 FPS
high40 FPS39 FPS
ultra30 FPS29 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Ryzen 5 150
1080p
low119 FPS117 FPS
medium95 FPS93 FPS
high79 FPS78 FPS
ultra59 FPS58 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS88 FPS
medium71 FPS70 FPS
high59 FPS58 FPS
ultra44 FPS44 FPS
4K
low59 FPS56 FPS
medium47 FPS42 FPS
high40 FPS33 FPS
ultra28 FPS23 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and Radeon Ryzen 5 150

NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 5 150

The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 reaches 2,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 512 (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 150).

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Ryzen 5 150
G3D Mark Score
2,637+2%
2,595
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9523 TFLOPS
1.211 TFLOPS+27%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+100%
32
L1 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Ryzen 5 150
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Ryzen 5 150
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 150's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Ryzen 5 150
TDP
100W
50W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
26.4
51.9+97%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Ryzen 5 150
MSRP
$350
Codename
GF114
Lexa
Release
March 22 2012
April 20 2017
Ranking
#704
#617