
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 5 150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
2012Radeon Ryzen 5 150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M better than Radeon Ryzen 5 150?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Ryzen 5 150 make more sense than MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 23 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and Radeon Ryzen 5 150

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.


Radeon Ryzen 5 150
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 reaches 2,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 512 (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 150).
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,637+2% | 2,595 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9523 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+27% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 150's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.4 | 51.9+97% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $350 |
| Codename | GF114 | Lexa |
| Release | March 22 2012 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #704 | #617 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














