
GeForce GTX 950A
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 5 150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 950A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $191 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 120.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌120.1% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 950A
2015Radeon Ryzen 5 150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $191 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 120.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌120.1% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 950A better than Radeon Ryzen 5 150?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Ryzen 5 150 make more sense than GeForce GTX 950A?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 23 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon Ryzen 5 150

GeForce GTX 950A
GeForce GTX 950A
The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.


Radeon Ryzen 5 150
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950A scores 2,599 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 reaches 2,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 512 (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,599 | 2,595 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+25% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.439 TFLOPS+19% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1183 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+150% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 950A gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Ryzen 5 150) — the GeForce GTX 950A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 32 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950A draws 75W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 150's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Perf/Watt | 34.7 | 51.9+50% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950A launched at $159 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 launched at $350. The GeForce GTX 950A costs 54.6% less ($191 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 7.4 (Radeon Ryzen 5 150) — the GeForce GTX 950A offers 120.3% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-55% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3+120% | 7.4 |
| Codename | GM107 | Lexa |
| Release | March 13 2015 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #621 | #617 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














