
GeForce GTX 850M
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 5 150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 850M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 850M
2014Radeon Ryzen 5 150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Ryzen 5 150 better than GeForce GTX 850M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 850M make more sense than Radeon Ryzen 5 150?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 850M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 850M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 850M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 850M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 23 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 850M and Radeon Ryzen 5 150

GeForce GTX 850M
GeForce GTX 850M
The GeForce GTX 850M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 936 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,537 points.


Radeon Ryzen 5 150
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 850M scores 2,537 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 reaches 2,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 850M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 512 (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Raw compute: 1.155 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 150).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 850M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,537 | 2,595+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+25% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.155 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+5% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+150% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 850M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 850M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Ryzen 5 150) — the GeForce GTX 850M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 850M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 850M draws 45W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 150's 50W — a 10.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 850M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 850M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 850M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-10% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 56.4+9% | 51.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 850M | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $350 |
| Codename | GM107 | Lexa |
| Release | March 12 2014 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #629 | #617 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













