
GeForce GTX 465
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 5 150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 465
2010Why buy it
- ✅29.8% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 465 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌25.4% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 465
2010Radeon Ryzen 5 150
2017Why buy it
- ✅29.8% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 465 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌25.4% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 465 better than Radeon Ryzen 5 150?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Ryzen 5 150 make more sense than GeForce GTX 465?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 52 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon Ryzen 5 150

GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 465
The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.


Radeon Ryzen 5 150
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 465 scores 2,654 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 reaches 2,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 465 is built on Fermi while the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 512 (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 150).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,654+2% | 2,595 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 512+45% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+42% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 44+38% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+450% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 465 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 465 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 has 2 GB. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 102.6 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 465 draws 200W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 150's 50W — a 120% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 465) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 150). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 50W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3 | 51.9+290% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 465 launched at $279 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 150 launched at $350. The GeForce GTX 465 costs 20.3% less ($71 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.5 (GeForce GTX 465) vs 7.4 (Radeon Ryzen 5 150) — the GeForce GTX 465 offers 28.4% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 5 150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 465 | Radeon Ryzen 5 150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279-20% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.5+28% | 7.4 |
| Codename | GF100 | Lexa |
| Release | May 31 2010 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #618 | #617 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














