Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX Vega M GH: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX Vega M GH: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX Vega M GH better than Quadro P3200 Max-Q?

Yes. Radeon RX Vega M GH is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 6,548 vs 6,500 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX Vega M GH is a 2018 card with FSR upscaling, while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a 2018 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 4 GB instead of Unknown and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX Vega M GH can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Radeon RX Vega M GH is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon RX Vega M GH is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.7% higher G3D Mark. Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about lower power draw (75W vs 100W) and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Quadro P3200 Max-Q make more sense than Radeon RX Vega M GH?

Yes. Quadro P3200 Max-Q is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (75W vs 100W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX Vega M GH. The trade-off is that Radeon RX Vega M GH currently gives you 0.7% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q Benchmark Check

Radeon RX Vega M GH Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	84 FPS	82 FPS
medium	72 FPS	70 FPS
high	61 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	73 FPS	72 FPS
medium	64 FPS	63 FPS
high	48 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	30 FPS
4K
low	26 FPS	26 FPS
medium	25 FPS	24 FPS
high	17 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	14 FPS

Open Quadro P3200 Max-Q Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	221 FPS	201 FPS
medium	187 FPS	168 FPS
high	143 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	114 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	166 FPS	148 FPS
medium	137 FPS	124 FPS
high	109 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	69 FPS
4K
low	96 FPS	78 FPS
medium	77 FPS	66 FPS
high	63 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	39 FPS

Open Quadro P3200 Max-Q Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	292 FPS	295 FPS
medium	234 FPS	236 FPS
high	195 FPS	196 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	147 FPS
1440p
low	219 FPS	221 FPS
medium	176 FPS	177 FPS
high	146 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	110 FPS
4K
low	146 FPS	147 FPS
medium	117 FPS	118 FPS
high	98 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	73 FPS

Open Quadro P3200 Max-Q Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	195 FPS	148 FPS
medium	159 FPS	122 FPS
high	138 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	109 FPS
medium	111 FPS	90 FPS
high	97 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	76 FPS	63 FPS
medium	61 FPS	50 FPS
high	49 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	29 FPS

Open Quadro P3200 Max-Q Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3200 Max-Q and Radeon RX Vega M GH

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

Radeon RX Vega M GH

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q scores 6,500 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 1404 MHz vs 1190 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon RX Vega M GH
G3D Mark Score	6,500	6,548
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1792+17%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.032 TFLOPS+38%	3.656 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1404 MHz+18%	1190 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	112+17%	96
L1 Cache	672 KB+75%	384 KB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon RX Vega M GH
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon RX Vega M GH
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM2
Bus Width	256-bit	1024-bit+300%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon RX Vega M GH
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3.

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon RX Vega M GH
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)	VCE 3.0
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q draws 75W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.