Quadro P3000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

NVIDIA

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

2017Core: 1088 MHzBoost: 1215 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018Core: 1063 MHzBoost: 1190 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

  • 4.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX Vega M GH: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming.
  • Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018

Why buy it

  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P3000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX Vega M GH better than Quadro P3000 (móvel)?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Quadro P3000 (móvel) averages 4.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,385 vs 6,548 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon RX Vega M GH is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P3000 (móvel) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 4 GB instead of Unknown and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon RX Vega M GH is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon RX Vega M GH is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $600 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.6% higher G3D Mark. Quadro P3000 (móvel) really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Quadro P3000 (móvel) make more sense than Radeon RX Vega M GH?
Yes. Quadro P3000 (móvel) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (75W vs 100W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $600 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX Vega M GH. The trade-off is that Radeon RX Vega M GH currently gives you 2.6% higher G3D Mark and lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Quadro P3000 (móvel) still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro P3000 (móvel)Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low81 FPS82 FPS
medium69 FPS70 FPS
high58 FPS60 FPS
ultra38 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low70 FPS72 FPS
medium61 FPS63 FPS
high45 FPS47 FPS
ultra29 FPS30 FPS
4K
low25 FPS26 FPS
medium24 FPS24 FPS
high16 FPS17 FPS
ultra14 FPS14 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro P3000 (móvel)Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low208 FPS201 FPS
medium176 FPS168 FPS
high133 FPS126 FPS
ultra102 FPS93 FPS
1440p
low154 FPS148 FPS
medium128 FPS124 FPS
high101 FPS96 FPS
ultra78 FPS69 FPS
4K
low84 FPS78 FPS
medium70 FPS66 FPS
high58 FPS55 FPS
ultra44 FPS39 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro P3000 (móvel)Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low287 FPS295 FPS
medium230 FPS236 FPS
high192 FPS196 FPS
ultra144 FPS147 FPS
1440p
low215 FPS221 FPS
medium172 FPS177 FPS
high144 FPS147 FPS
ultra108 FPS110 FPS
4K
low144 FPS147 FPS
medium115 FPS118 FPS
high93 FPS98 FPS
ultra62 FPS73 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro P3000 (móvel)Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low159 FPS148 FPS
medium129 FPS122 FPS
high112 FPS106 FPS
ultra94 FPS90 FPS
1440p
low112 FPS109 FPS
medium92 FPS90 FPS
high80 FPS78 FPS
ultra65 FPS65 FPS
4K
low63 FPS63 FPS
medium50 FPS50 FPS
high39 FPS38 FPS
ultra28 FPS29 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 (móvel) and Radeon RX Vega M GH

NVIDIA

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1088 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,385 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GH

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3000 (móvel) scores 6,385 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 3.11 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 1215 MHz vs 1190 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P3000 (móvel)Radeon RX Vega M GH
G3D Mark Score
6,385
6,548+3%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 4.0
Process Node
16 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1280
1536+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.11 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS+18%
Boost Clock
1215 MHz+2%
1190 MHz
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
80
96+20%
L1 Cache
480 KB+25%
384 KB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P3000 (móvel)Radeon RX Vega M GH
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P3000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Quadro P3000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P3000 (móvel)Radeon RX Vega M GH
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
HBM2
Bus Width
256-bit
1024-bit+300%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureQuadro P3000 (móvel)Radeon RX Vega M GH
TDP
75W-25%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
85.1+30%
65.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P3000 (móvel) launched at $600 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.6 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).

FeatureQuadro P3000 (móvel)Radeon RX Vega M GH
MSRP
$600
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
10.6
Infinity
Codename
GP104
Polaris 22
Release
January 11 2017
February 1 2018
Ranking
#380
#373