FirePro W8100 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

FirePro W8100

2014Core: 824 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018Core: 1063 MHzBoost: 1190 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro W8100

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX Vega M GH: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
  • 24000% longer card at 241mm vs 1mm.

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 241mm, a 240mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro W8100 better than Radeon RX Vega M GH?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,812 vs 6,548 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro W8100 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W8100 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 8 GB instead of Unknown and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
FirePro W8100 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $2,499 MSRP. FirePro W8100 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. FirePro W8100 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $2,499 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 4.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer 2018 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (100W vs 220W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon RX Vega M GH make more sense than FirePro W8100?
Yes. Radeon RX Vega M GH is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still fine for 1080p, but 1440p and especially 4K require more compromise. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (100W vs 220W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of FirePro W8100. The trade-off is that FirePro W8100 currently gives you 4.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro W8100Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low139 FPS82 FPS
medium118 FPS70 FPS
high97 FPS60 FPS
ultra59 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low117 FPS72 FPS
medium98 FPS63 FPS
high74 FPS47 FPS
ultra44 FPS30 FPS
4K
low41 FPS26 FPS
medium37 FPS24 FPS
high23 FPS17 FPS
ultra20 FPS14 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro W8100Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low233 FPS201 FPS
medium198 FPS168 FPS
high149 FPS126 FPS
ultra117 FPS93 FPS
1440p
low169 FPS148 FPS
medium139 FPS124 FPS
high112 FPS96 FPS
ultra87 FPS69 FPS
4K
low96 FPS78 FPS
medium78 FPS66 FPS
high65 FPS55 FPS
ultra48 FPS39 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro W8100Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low307 FPS295 FPS
medium245 FPS236 FPS
high204 FPS196 FPS
ultra153 FPS147 FPS
1440p
low230 FPS221 FPS
medium184 FPS177 FPS
high153 FPS147 FPS
ultra115 FPS110 FPS
4K
low153 FPS147 FPS
medium123 FPS118 FPS
high102 FPS98 FPS
ultra77 FPS73 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro W8100Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low277 FPS148 FPS
medium238 FPS122 FPS
high196 FPS106 FPS
ultra153 FPS90 FPS
1440p
low203 FPS109 FPS
medium178 FPS90 FPS
high140 FPS78 FPS
ultra107 FPS65 FPS
4K
low112 FPS63 FPS
medium89 FPS50 FPS
high72 FPS38 FPS
ultra53 FPS29 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W8100 and Radeon RX Vega M GH

AMD

FirePro W8100

The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GH

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH).

FeatureFirePro W8100Radeon RX Vega M GH
G3D Mark Score
6,812+4%
6,548
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2560+67%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.219 TFLOPS+15%
3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160+67%
96
L1 Cache
640 KB+67%
384 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W8100Radeon RX Vega M GH
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W8100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The FirePro W8100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 1024-bit.

FeatureFirePro W8100Radeon RX Vega M GH
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
HBM2
Bus Width
256-bit
1024-bit+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro W8100Radeon RX Vega M GH
DirectX
12
12_1
Max Displays
6
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3.

FeatureFirePro W8100Radeon RX Vega M GH
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 75% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 241mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureFirePro W8100Radeon RX Vega M GH
TDP
220W
100W-55%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
241mm
1mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
87°C
Perf/Watt
31.0
65.5+111%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W8100 launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($2499 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro W8100) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W8100Radeon RX Vega M GH
MSRP
$2499
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
2.7
Infinity
Codename
Hawaii
Polaris 22
Release
June 23 2014
February 1 2018
Ranking
#361
#373