
FirePro W8100
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro W8100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX Vega M GH: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
- ❌24000% longer card at 241mm vs 1mm.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 241mm, a 240mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
FirePro W8100
2014Radeon RX Vega M GH
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX Vega M GH: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 241mm, a 240mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
- ❌24000% longer card at 241mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro W8100 better than Radeon RX Vega M GH?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX Vega M GH make more sense than FirePro W8100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 73 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W8100 and Radeon RX Vega M GH

FirePro W8100
FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,812+4% | 6,548 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+67% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.219 TFLOPS+15% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+67% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB+67% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W8100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The FirePro W8100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 1024-bit.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 1024-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 75% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 241mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 100W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 241mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 87°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0 | 65.5+111% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W8100 launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($2499 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro W8100) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | Hawaii | Polaris 22 |
| Release | June 23 2014 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #361 | #373 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












