
Arc B570
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 64
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc B570
2025Why buy it
- ✅24.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 295W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌127.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.0 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ❌96.7% higher power demand at 295W vs 150W.
Arc B570
2025Radeon RX Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅24.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 295W, a 145W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌127.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.0 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ❌96.7% higher power demand at 295W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Arc B570 better than Radeon RX Vega 64?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 127 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc B570 and Radeon RX Vega 64

Arc B570
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.

Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Arc B570 scores 14,060 and the Radeon RX Vega 64 reaches 13,949 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon RX Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 1546 MHz.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,060 | 13,949 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4096+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.52 TFLOPS | 12.66 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz+62% | 1546 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 256+78% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+350% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+350% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 380 GB/s (Arc B570) vs 484 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 64) — a 27.4% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 64. Bus width: 160-bit vs 2048-bit. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 380 GB/s | 484 GB/s+27% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 2048-bit+1180% |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+350% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64).
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W — a 65.2% difference. The Arc B570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 249mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-49% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-20% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 249mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 93.7+98% | 47.3 |
Value Analysis
The Arc B570 launched at $219 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499. The Arc B570 costs 56.1% less ($280 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.2 (Arc B570) vs 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the Arc B570 offers 129.3% better value. The Arc B570 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-56% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.2+129% | 28.0 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 16 2025 | August 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #169 | #171 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













