
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅0.4% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌58.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 180W.
Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 285W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅0.4% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 285W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌58.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 180W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon RX 7900M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 7900M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 480 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 938 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 769 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 252 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 653 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 640 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 435 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 252 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon RX 7900M

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M
The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 22,385 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 41.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7900M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2090 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 72 (Radeon RX 7900M) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+41% | 22,385 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+67% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+4% | 38.52 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+25% | 2090 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 192+140% |
| TMUs | 240 | 288+20% |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+150% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 72+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900M has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 7900M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 576 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 180W — a 45.2% difference. The Radeon RX 7900M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 330W (Radeon RX 7900M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 285mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 180W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 330W-53% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 285mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8 | 124.4+12% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












