
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 60.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Newer upscaling generation: DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) vs FSR 3 (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅3.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 60.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
2025Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 60.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Newer upscaling generation: DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) vs FSR 3 (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅3.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 60.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5060 Ti better than Radeon RX 7900M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 7900M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 480 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 890 FPS | 938 FPS |
| medium | 718 FPS | 769 FPS |
| high | 637 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 516 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 462 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 252 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 744 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 653 FPS |
| high | 533 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 479 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 601 FPS | 640 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 435 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 254 FPS | 252 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5060 Ti and Radeon RX 7900M

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2407 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,918 points. Launch price was $379.

Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M
The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti scores 22,918 and the Radeon RX 7900M reaches 22,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7900M uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M). Raw compute: 23.7 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M). Boost clocks: 2572 MHz vs 2090 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 72 (Radeon RX 7900M) with 144 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,918+2% | 22,385 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.7 TFLOPS | 38.52 TFLOPS+63% |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz+23% | 2090 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 192+300% |
| TMUs | 144 | 288+100% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+50% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 72+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti uses DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900M) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 576 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 180W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 7900M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti) vs 330W (Radeon RX 7900M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 247mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 330W-27% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 247mm | 0mm |
| Height | 135mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 127.3+2% | 124.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379 | — |
| Codename | GB206 | Navi 31 |
| Release | April 16 2025 | October 19 2023 |
| Ranking | #57 | #62 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












