GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs Radeon RX 7900M

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 7900M

2023Core: 1825 MHzBoost: 2090 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

2023

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon RX 7900M

2023

Why buy it

  • 7.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB better than Radeon RX 7900M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Radeon RX 7900M averages 7.3% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 22,713 vs 22,385 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the overall package: you are getting DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation instead of FSR 3 + AFMF. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $499 MSRP. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $499 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.5% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $499 MSRP gets you and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.
Is Radeon RX 7900M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon RX 7900M is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7900M
1080p
low223 FPS223 FPS
medium208 FPS207 FPS
high182 FPS182 FPS
ultra168 FPS166 FPS
1440p
low197 FPS202 FPS
medium166 FPS171 FPS
high137 FPS141 FPS
ultra131 FPS133 FPS
4K
low138 FPS137 FPS
medium115 FPS115 FPS
high94 FPS92 FPS
ultra87 FPS86 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7900M
1080p
low433 FPS576 FPS
medium366 FPS480 FPS
high296 FPS368 FPS
ultra241 FPS314 FPS
1440p
low279 FPS393 FPS
medium239 FPS326 FPS
high195 FPS257 FPS
ultra162 FPS209 FPS
4K
low123 FPS194 FPS
medium102 FPS164 FPS
high84 FPS140 FPS
ultra66 FPS113 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7900M
1080p
low888 FPS938 FPS
medium716 FPS769 FPS
high628 FPS672 FPS
ultra511 FPS504 FPS
1440p
low676 FPS709 FPS
medium537 FPS583 FPS
high460 FPS504 FPS
ultra383 FPS378 FPS
4K
low458 FPS495 FPS
medium363 FPS403 FPS
high312 FPS336 FPS
ultra256 FPS252 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7900M
1080p
low775 FPS765 FPS
medium639 FPS653 FPS
high558 FPS588 FPS
ultra492 FPS504 FPS
1440p
low613 FPS640 FPS
medium503 FPS549 FPS
high435 FPS480 FPS
ultra378 FPS378 FPS
4K
low375 FPS435 FPS
medium322 FPS379 FPS
high298 FPS336 FPS
ultra256 FPS252 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and Radeon RX 7900M

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.

AMD

Radeon RX 7900M

The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB scores 22,713 and the Radeon RX 7900M reaches 22,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7900M uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2090 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 72 (Radeon RX 7900M) with 136 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7900M
G3D Mark Score
22,713+1%
22,385
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
5 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
4352
4608+6%
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS
38.52 TFLOPS+75%
Boost Clock
2535 MHz+21%
2090 MHz
ROPs
48
192+300%
TMUs
136
288+112%
L1 Cache
4.3 MB+43%
3 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+433%
6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
34
72+112%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7900M
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR 3
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7900M
VRAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
576 GB/s+100%
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
32 MB+433%
6 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7900M
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+300%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7900M
Encoder
NVENC 8th gen
VCN 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC 5th gen
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws 165W versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 180W — a 8.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 330W (Radeon RX 7900M). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2.2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7900M
TDP
165W-8%
180W
Recommended PSU
550W
330W-40%
Power Connector
16-pin (12VHPWR)
Mobile
Length
240mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2.2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C-24%
85°C
Perf/Watt
137.7+11%
124.4