
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅7.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅7.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB better than Radeon RX 7900M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 7900M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 480 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 888 FPS | 938 FPS |
| medium | 716 FPS | 769 FPS |
| high | 628 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 511 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 676 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 537 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 252 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 653 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 640 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 435 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 252 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and Radeon RX 7900M

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M
The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB scores 22,713 and the Radeon RX 7900M reaches 22,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7900M uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2090 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 72 (Radeon RX 7900M) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,713+1% | 22,385 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 4608+6% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 38.52 TFLOPS+75% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+21% | 2090 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 192+300% |
| TMUs | 136 | 288+112% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+43% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 72+112% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 576 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws 165W versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 180W — a 8.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 330W (Radeon RX 7900M). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2.2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W-8% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 330W-40% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2.2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 137.7+11% | 124.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












