G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+97.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌58.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 180W.

Radeon RX 7800M

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 180W instead of 285W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,984 vs 31,578).
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon RX 7800M

2024

Why buy it

✅+97.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 180W instead of 285W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌58.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 180W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,984 vs 31,578).
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon RX 7800M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 15,984 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon RX 7800M is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR 3 + AFMF. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 97.6% more raw performance headroom, the stronger feature stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation instead of FSR 3 + AFMF, and a 4nm process instead of 5nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $799 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 97.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Radeon RX 7800M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (180W vs 285W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon RX 7800M make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti?

Yes. Radeon RX 7800M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (180W vs 285W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4070 Ti currently gives you 97.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 7800M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 7800M
1080p
low	188 FPS	215 FPS
medium	171 FPS	196 FPS
high	155 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	133 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	180 FPS
medium	125 FPS	147 FPS
high	111 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	94 FPS
medium	79 FPS	78 FPS
high	66 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon RX 7800M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 7800M
1080p
low	664 FPS	434 FPS
medium	539 FPS	372 FPS
high	415 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	267 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	338 FPS
medium	400 FPS	288 FPS
high	329 FPS	233 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	193 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	169 FPS
medium	211 FPS	145 FPS
high	187 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	96 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon RX 7800M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 7800M
1080p
low	921 FPS	719 FPS
medium	742 FPS	575 FPS
high	652 FPS	480 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	360 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	539 FPS
medium	578 FPS	432 FPS
high	497 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	270 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	360 FPS
medium	403 FPS	288 FPS
high	352 FPS	240 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	180 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon RX 7800M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 7800M
1080p
low	879 FPS	582 FPS
medium	731 FPS	514 FPS
high	664 FPS	453 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	360 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	461 FPS
medium	585 FPS	413 FPS
high	514 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	270 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	322 FPS
medium	408 FPS	288 FPS
high	366 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	180 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon RX 7800M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon RX 7800M

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 7800M

The Radeon RX 7800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,984 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon RX 7800M's 15,984 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 97.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7800M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 7800M). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7800M). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2335 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 60 (Radeon RX 7800M) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 7800M
G3D Mark Score	31,578+98%	15,984
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	7680+100%	3840
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+12%	35.87 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+12%	2335 MHz
ROPs	80	96+20%
TMUs	240	240
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+900%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+1100%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	60	60

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7800M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7800M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 7800M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7800M) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 7800M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 7800M
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	12 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s+17%	432 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	192-bit
L2 Cache	48 MB+1100%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7800M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 7800M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7800M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7800M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 7800M
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon RX 7800M's 180W — a 45.2% difference. The Radeon RX 7800M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7800M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 285mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 7800M
TDP	285W	180W-37%
Recommended PSU	700W	650W-7%
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	285mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	110.8+25%	88.8