GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs Radeon RX 7700

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 7700

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 2600 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

2023

Why buy it

  • 29.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
  • Draws 165W instead of 190W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 11.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $499 MSRPvs$449 MSRP

Radeon RX 7700

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
  • 15.2% higher power demand at 190W vs 165W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB better than Radeon RX 7700?
Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 29.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 2.6% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation instead of FSR 3 + AFMF and a 5nm process instead of 6nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is about 11.1% more expensive on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $449 MSRP, and you are getting 29.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 7700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon RX 7700 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
Is Radeon RX 7700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon RX 7700 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $449 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7700
1080p
low223 FPS210 FPS
medium208 FPS192 FPS
high182 FPS169 FPS
ultra168 FPS153 FPS
1440p
low197 FPS192 FPS
medium166 FPS160 FPS
high137 FPS134 FPS
ultra131 FPS125 FPS
4K
low138 FPS125 FPS
medium115 FPS104 FPS
high94 FPS82 FPS
ultra87 FPS75 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7700
1080p
low433 FPS374 FPS
medium366 FPS319 FPS
high296 FPS249 FPS
ultra241 FPS198 FPS
1440p
low279 FPS229 FPS
medium239 FPS197 FPS
high195 FPS156 FPS
ultra162 FPS126 FPS
4K
low123 FPS106 FPS
medium102 FPS89 FPS
high84 FPS73 FPS
ultra66 FPS56 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7700
1080p
low888 FPS838 FPS
medium716 FPS684 FPS
high628 FPS600 FPS
ultra511 FPS498 FPS
1440p
low676 FPS643 FPS
medium537 FPS520 FPS
high460 FPS443 FPS
ultra383 FPS374 FPS
4K
low458 FPS441 FPS
medium363 FPS355 FPS
high312 FPS298 FPS
ultra256 FPS240 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7700
1080p
low775 FPS602 FPS
medium639 FPS514 FPS
high558 FPS441 FPS
ultra492 FPS352 FPS
1440p
low613 FPS465 FPS
medium503 FPS394 FPS
high435 FPS320 FPS
ultra378 FPS258 FPS
4K
low375 FPS291 FPS
medium322 FPS268 FPS
high298 FPS232 FPS
ultra256 FPS189 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and Radeon RX 7700

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.

AMD

Radeon RX 7700

The Radeon RX 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,146 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB scores 22,713 and the Radeon RX 7700 reaches 22,146 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7700). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7700) with 136 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7700
G3D Mark Score
22,713+3%
22,146
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
5 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
4352+113%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS+8%
20.48 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2535 MHz
2600 MHz+3%
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
136+6%
128
L1 Cache
4.3 MB+760%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+1500%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
34+6%
32

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7700 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7700
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR 3
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 624 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700) — a 116.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 7700. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7700
VRAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
624 GB/s+117%
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
32 MB+1500%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7700
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7700).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7700
Encoder
NVENC 8th gen
VCN 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC 5th gen
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws 165W versus the Radeon RX 7700's 190W — a 14.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7700). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 240mm, occupying 2.2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7700
TDP
165W-13%
190W
Recommended PSU
550W-15%
650W
Power Connector
16-pin (12VHPWR)
2x 8-pin
Length
240mm
240mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2.2
2-9%
Temp (Load)
65°C-13%
75°C
Perf/Watt
137.7+18%
116.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7700 launched at $449. The Radeon RX 7700 costs 10% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 49.3 (Radeon RX 7700) — the Radeon RX 7700 offers 8.4% better value.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBRadeon RX 7700
MSRP
$499
$449-10%
Performance per Dollar
45.5
49.3+8%
Codename
AD106
Navi 33
Release
May 18 2023
January 4 2023
Ranking
#56
#140