G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 3000

2018

Why buy it

✅22.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌188.9% higher power demand at 260W vs 90W.

Radeon RX 7600M

2023

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 90W instead of 260W, a 170W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $800 MSRP).

Quadro RTX 3000

2018

Radeon RX 7600M

2023

Why buy it

✅22.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 90W instead of 260W, a 170W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌188.9% higher power demand at 260W vs 90W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $800 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 7600M better than Quadro RTX 3000?

Yes. Radeon RX 7600M is clearly the better overall GPU here. Quadro RTX 3000 averages 22.2% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 10,999 vs 10,858 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 7600M is a 2023 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while Quadro RTX 3000 is a 2018 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 7600M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 6 GB, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 6nm process instead of 12nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 7600M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $800 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.3% higher G3D Mark. Quadro RTX 3000 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 7600M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Quadro RTX 3000 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is Quadro RTX 3000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro RTX 3000 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $800 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon RX 7600M earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 3000 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 7600M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600M
1080p
low	123 FPS	164 FPS
medium	113 FPS	146 FPS
high	98 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	106 FPS	138 FPS
medium	91 FPS	112 FPS
high	77 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	89 FPS
4K
low	56 FPS	83 FPS
medium	50 FPS	70 FPS
high	41 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	47 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 Open Radeon RX 7600M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600M
1080p
low	451 FPS	346 FPS
medium	391 FPS	294 FPS
high	317 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	178 FPS
1440p
low	296 FPS	217 FPS
medium	244 FPS	185 FPS
high	211 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	143 FPS	100 FPS
medium	126 FPS	84 FPS
high	108 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	54 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 Open Radeon RX 7600M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600M
1080p
low	489 FPS	495 FPS
medium	391 FPS	396 FPS
high	326 FPS	330 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	247 FPS
1440p
low	366 FPS	371 FPS
medium	293 FPS	297 FPS
high	244 FPS	247 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	186 FPS
4K
low	244 FPS	247 FPS
medium	195 FPS	198 FPS
high	163 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	124 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 Open Radeon RX 7600M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600M
1080p
low	489 FPS	495 FPS
medium	391 FPS	396 FPS
high	326 FPS	330 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	247 FPS
1440p
low	366 FPS	371 FPS
medium	293 FPS	297 FPS
high	244 FPS	247 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	186 FPS
4K
low	244 FPS	247 FPS
medium	195 FPS	198 FPS
high	163 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	124 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 Open Radeon RX 7600M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 3000 and Radeon RX 7600M

Quadro RTX 3000

The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.

Radeon RX 7600M

The Radeon RX 7600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2410 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,999 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 3000 scores 10,858 and the Radeon RX 7600M reaches 10,999 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 3000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7600M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7600M). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 17.27 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2410 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 28 (Radeon RX 7600M) with 576 Tensor cores.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600M
G3D Mark Score	10,858	10,999+1%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	4608+157%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.31 TFLOPS	17.27 TFLOPS+6%
Boost Clock	1770 MHz	2410 MHz+36%
ROPs	96+50%	64
TMUs	288+157%	112
L1 Cache	4.5 MB+800%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB+200%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	72+157%	28

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 3000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 3000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 3000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600M has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600M) — the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB+200%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7600M). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600M
DirectX	12.1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.0	1.3+30%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M).

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600M
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 3000 draws 260W versus the Radeon RX 7600M's 90W — a 97.1% difference. The Radeon RX 7600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 500W (Radeon RX 7600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.