
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 90W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600M across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Radeon RX 7600M
2023Why buy it
- ✅37.2% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 90W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX 7600M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 90W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅37.2% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600M across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 90W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600M better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon RX 7600M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 124 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 124 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 7600M

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 7600M
Radeon RX 7600M
The Radeon RX 7600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2410 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,999 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 and the Radeon RX 7600M reaches 10,999 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7600M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7600M). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 17.27 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2410 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 28 (Radeon RX 7600M) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 10,999+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 17.27 TFLOPS+155% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2410 MHz+64% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 112+56% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+360% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 28+56% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600M has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600M) — a 52.4% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 256 GB/s+52% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 7600M's 90W — a 25% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Radeon RX 7600M). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-22% | 90W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+26% | 122.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 33 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #248 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












