
GeForce GTX 980
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌144.4% higher power demand at 220W vs 90W.
Radeon RX 7600M
2023Why buy it
- ✅60.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 220W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 980
2014Radeon RX 7600M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅60.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 220W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌144.4% higher power demand at 220W vs 90W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600M better than GeForce GTX 980?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 124 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 124 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 and Radeon RX 7600M

GeForce GTX 980
GeForce GTX 980
The GeForce GTX 980 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,077 points. Launch price was $549.

Radeon RX 7600M
Radeon RX 7600M
The Radeon RX 7600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2410 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,999 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 scores 11,077 and the Radeon RX 7600M reaches 10,999 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7600M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7600M). Raw compute: 4.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980) vs 17.27 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M). Boost clocks: 1216 MHz vs 2410 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,077 | 10,999 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.981 TFLOPS | 17.27 TFLOPS+247% |
| Boost Clock | 1216 MHz | 2410 MHz+98% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128+14% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 980 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 980 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600M has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600M) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 256 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7600M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 draws 220W versus the Radeon RX 7600M's 90W — a 83.9% difference. The Radeon RX 7600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 980) vs 500W (Radeon RX 7600M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 90W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 50.4 | 122.2+142% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 33 |
| Release | September 19 2014 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #245 | #248 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












