
Quadro P4000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P4000
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌309.5% HIGHER MSRP$815 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌144.2% higher power demand at 105W vs 43W.
Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $616 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 317.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 105W, a 62W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro P4000
2017Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $616 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 317.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 105W, a 62W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌309.5% HIGHER MSRP$815 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌144.2% higher power demand at 105W vs 43W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7400 better than Quadro P4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 47 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 514 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 412 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 131 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 and Radeon RX 7400

Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.

Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4000 scores 11,431 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 2300 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,431 | 11,654+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.304 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+211% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz | 2300 MHz+55% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB+31% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P4000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 draws 105W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 83.8% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4000) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 105W | 43W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 241mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.9 | 271.0+149% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4000 launched at $815 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 75.6% less ($616 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 318.6% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $815 | $199-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.0 | 58.6+319% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | February 6 2017 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #239 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












