
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 58.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌86% higher power demand at 80W vs 43W.
Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅5.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 80W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
2019Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅5.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 80W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 58.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌86% higher power demand at 80W vs 43W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7400 better than GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 131 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design and Radeon RX 7400

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 885 MHz to 1185 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,461 points.

Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design scores 11,461 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 5.46 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1185 MHz vs 2300 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 28 (Radeon RX 7400) with 288 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,461 | 11,654+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.46 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+202% |
| Boost Clock | 1185 MHz | 2300 MHz+94% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+29% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+360% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36+29% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) — the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 GB/s+200% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 60.2% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 43W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 143.3 | 271.0+89% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Codename | TU106B | Navi 33 |
| Release | January 29 2019 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #237 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












