
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7400 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25.1% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅12.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅12.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7400 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25.1% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7400 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 131 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon RX 7400

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon RX 7400's 11,654 — the Radeon RX 7400 leads by 15.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2300 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 11,654+16% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+86% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2300 MHz+33% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7400 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7400 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+50% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 122.9% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: 6-pin vs None. Card length: 173mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 43W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-11% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | None |
| Length | 173mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 271.0+385% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 20.1% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 45% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $199-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 58.6+45% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #137 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













