Arc A770M vs Radeon RX 7400

CPU

GPU

Arc A770M

2022Core: 1650 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Radeon RX 7400

2025Core: 1452 MHzBoost: 2300 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A770M

16 GB 120

11,853

+1.7%

11,654

0.0%

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB

Radeon RX 6800

Radeon RX 6900 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A770M

2022

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 58.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌179.1% higher power demand at 120W vs 43W.

Radeon RX 7400

2025

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 43W instead of 120W, a 77W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Arc A770M

2022

Radeon RX 7400

2025

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 43W instead of 120W, a 77W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 58.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌179.1% higher power demand at 120W vs 43W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A770M better than Radeon RX 7400?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 11,853 vs 11,654 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Arc A770M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 7400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2022 and better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 7400 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $199 MSRP. Arc A770M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Arc A770M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and you are getting 1.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 7400 is the newer 2025 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (43W vs 120W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon RX 7400 make more sense than Arc A770M?

Yes. Radeon RX 7400 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (43W vs 120W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $199 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Arc A770M. The trade-off is that Arc A770M currently gives you 1.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 7400 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A770M Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 7400 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A770M	Radeon RX 7400
1080p
low	223 FPS	163 FPS
medium	207 FPS	145 FPS
high	181 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	202 FPS	137 FPS
medium	170 FPS	111 FPS
high	140 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	137 FPS	82 FPS
medium	115 FPS	69 FPS
high	92 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	47 FPS

Open Arc A770M Open Radeon RX 7400

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A770M	Radeon RX 7400
1080p
low	376 FPS	337 FPS
medium	324 FPS	281 FPS
high	263 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	166 FPS
1440p
low	232 FPS	213 FPS
medium	204 FPS	178 FPS
high	167 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	107 FPS
4K
low	118 FPS	98 FPS
medium	98 FPS	81 FPS
high	83 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	49 FPS

Open Arc A770M Open Radeon RX 7400

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A770M	Radeon RX 7400
1080p
low	533 FPS	524 FPS
medium	427 FPS	420 FPS
high	356 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	267 FPS	262 FPS
1440p
low	400 FPS	393 FPS
medium	320 FPS	315 FPS
high	267 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	267 FPS	262 FPS
medium	213 FPS	210 FPS
high	178 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	131 FPS

Open Arc A770M Open Radeon RX 7400

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A770M	Radeon RX 7400
1080p
low	533 FPS	508 FPS
medium	427 FPS	420 FPS
high	356 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	267 FPS	262 FPS
1440p
low	400 FPS	393 FPS
medium	320 FPS	315 FPS
high	267 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	267 FPS	262 FPS
medium	213 FPS	210 FPS
high	178 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	131 FPS

Open Arc A770M Open Radeon RX 7400

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770M and Radeon RX 7400

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

Radeon RX 7400

The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2300 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770M) vs 28 (Radeon RX 7400) with 512 Tensor cores.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon RX 7400
G3D Mark Score	11,853+2%	11,654
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	6 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	4096+129%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.79 TFLOPS+2%	16.49 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz	2300 MHz+12%
ROPs	128+100%	64
TMUs	256+129%	112
L1 Cache	6 MB+1100%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	32+14%	28

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A770M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon RX 7400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7400 has 8 GB. The Arc A770M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770M) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) — a 300% advantage for the Arc A770M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon RX 7400
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+300%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon RX 7400
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon RX 7400
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 94.5% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon RX 7400
TDP	120W	43W-64%
Recommended PSU	500W	450W-10%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	241mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	98.8	271.0+174%