
Arc A580
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A580
2023Why buy it
- ✅3.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.4 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌307% higher power demand at 175W vs 43W.
- ❌12.4% longer card at 271mm vs 241mm.
Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 175W, a 132W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 271mm, a 30mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A580 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌11.2% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 58.6 vs 67.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Arc A580
2023Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅3.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.4 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 175W, a 132W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 271mm, a 30mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌307% higher power demand at 175W vs 43W.
- ❌12.4% longer card at 271mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A580 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌11.2% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 58.6 vs 67.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A580 better than Radeon RX 7400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7400 make more sense than Arc A580?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A580 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A580 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A580 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A580 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 131 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A580 and Radeon RX 7400

Arc A580
Arc A580
The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.

Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A580 scores 12,060 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A580 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A580) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2300 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (Arc A580) vs 28 (Radeon RX 7400) with 384 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,060+3% | 11,654 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+71% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2300 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+71% | 112 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 28+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A580 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A580) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) — a 300% advantage for the Arc A580. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A580) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) — the Arc A580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+300% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A580) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A580) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A580 draws 175W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 121.1% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc A580) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs None. Card length: 271mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 43W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | None |
| Length | 271mm | 241mm |
| Height | 132mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9 | 271.0+293% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A580 launched at $179 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199. The Arc A580 costs 10.1% less ($20 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 67.4 (Arc A580) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Arc A580 offers 15% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-10% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.4+15% | 58.6 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Navi 33 |
| Release | October 10 2023 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #223 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













