
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6900 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 93.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6900 XT across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Radeon RX 6900 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅39.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌203.6% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon RX 6900 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 93.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅39.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6900 XT across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌203.6% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6900 XT better than GeForce RTX 3060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3060 make more sense than Radeon RX 6900 XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 95 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 111 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 924 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 767 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 585 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 290 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 256 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon RX 6900 XT

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,729 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon RX 6900 XT's 26,729 — the Radeon RX 6900 XT leads by 57.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6900 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 5,120 (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 23.04 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2250 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 80 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) with 112 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995 | 26,729+57% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 5120+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS+81% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2250 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 48 | 128+167% |
| TMUs | 112 | 320+186% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+250% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6900 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6900 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 6900 XT offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — a 42.2% advantage for the Radeon RX 6900 XT. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — the Radeon RX 6900 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 512 GB/s+42% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 6900 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon RX 6900 XT's 300W — a 55.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 850W (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2.5 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-43% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-35% | 850W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-20% | 2.5 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+12% | 89.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 67.1% less ($670 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 26.8 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 92.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-67% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+93% | 26.8 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #114 | #35 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












