
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6800 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌74.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,130 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 38.5 G3D/$ ($1,130 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Radeon RX 6800 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅3.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $481 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 75.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.5 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
2023Radeon RX 6800 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅3.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $481 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 75.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.5 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌74.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,130 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 38.5 G3D/$ ($1,130 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6800 XT better than GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile make more sense than Radeon RX 6800 XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 83 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 327 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 89 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 924 FPS |
| medium | 722 FPS | 767 FPS |
| high | 634 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 550 FPS | 562 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 466 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 359 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 252 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and Radeon RX 6800 XT

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 2010 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,805 points.

Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT
The Radeon RX 6800 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,995 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 24,805 and the Radeon RX 6800 XT reaches 24,995 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6800 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,424 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 4,608 (Radeon RX 6800 XT). Raw compute: 24.72 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 20.74 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800 XT). Boost clocks: 2010 MHz vs 2250 MHz. Ray tracing: 58 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 72 (Radeon RX 6800 XT) with 232 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24,805 | 24,995 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 7424+61% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 24.72 TFLOPS+19% | 20.74 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2010 MHz | 2250 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 80 | 128+60% |
| TMUs | 232 | 288+24% |
| L1 Cache | 7.3 MB+630% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58 | 72+24% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6800 XT relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6800 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6800 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 6800 XT offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800 XT) — a 18.5% advantage for the Radeon RX 6800 XT. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6800 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 512 GB/s+19% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 6800 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6800 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 6800 XT's 300W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 750W (Radeon RX 6800 XT). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-50% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 165.4+99% | 83.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile launched at $1130 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6800 XT launched at $649. The Radeon RX 6800 XT costs 42.6% less ($481 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.0 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 38.5 (Radeon RX 6800 XT) — the Radeon RX 6800 XT offers 75% better value. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1130 | $649-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0 | 38.5+75% |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #43 | #42 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












