G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon RX 6800

2020

Why buy it

✅+8.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌42.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 175W.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅Newer upscaling generation: DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) vs FSR 3 (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 175W instead of 250W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,312 vs 22,056).
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.

Radeon RX 6800

2020

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅+8.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅Newer upscaling generation: DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) vs FSR 3 (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 175W instead of 250W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌42.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 175W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,312 vs 22,056).
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6800 better than RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 22,056 vs 20,312 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon RX 6800 is the overall package: you are getting FSR 3 + AFMF.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020, better upscaling support with DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) instead of FSR 3 (2023), and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6800 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon RX 6800 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $579 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 8.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (175W vs 250W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU make more sense than Radeon RX 6800?

Yes. RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (175W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX 6800. The trade-off is that Radeon RX 6800 currently gives you 8.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 6800 Benchmark Check

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6800	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low	221 FPS	226 FPS
medium	203 FPS	198 FPS
high	178 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	161 FPS	118 FPS
1440p
low	200 FPS	202 FPS
medium	167 FPS	168 FPS
high	138 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	135 FPS	106 FPS
medium	114 FPS	89 FPS
high	90 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	54 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6800 Open RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6800	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low	508 FPS	609 FPS
medium	436 FPS	507 FPS
high	346 FPS	395 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	344 FPS
1440p
low	338 FPS	499 FPS
medium	283 FPS	417 FPS
high	231 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	189 FPS	278 FPS
4K
low	144 FPS	292 FPS
medium	124 FPS	249 FPS
high	105 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	189 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6800 Open RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon RX 6800	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low	901 FPS	914 FPS
medium	734 FPS	731 FPS
high	637 FPS	609 FPS
ultra	496 FPS	457 FPS
1440p
low	691 FPS	686 FPS
medium	557 FPS	548 FPS
high	471 FPS	457 FPS
ultra	372 FPS	343 FPS
4K
low	482 FPS	457 FPS
medium	391 FPS	366 FPS
high	324 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	229 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6800 Open RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon RX 6800	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low	641 FPS	491 FPS
medium	547 FPS	430 FPS
high	481 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	294 FPS
1440p
low	536 FPS	342 FPS
medium	462 FPS	309 FPS
high	395 FPS	272 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	207 FPS
4K
low	343 FPS	227 FPS
medium	306 FPS	195 FPS
high	276 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	119 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6800 Open RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6800 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

Radeon RX 6800

The Radeon RX 6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,056 points. Launch price was $579.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6800 scores 22,056 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 20,312 — the Radeon RX 6800 leads by 8.6%. The Radeon RX 6800 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon RX 6800) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2105 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon RX 6800) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 400.

Feature	Radeon RX 6800	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	22,056+9%	20,312
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	7 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3840	12800+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.17 TFLOPS	65.28 TFLOPS+304%
Boost Clock	2105 MHz	2550 MHz+21%
ROPs	96	176+83%
TMUs	240	400+67%
L1 Cache	0.75 MB	12.5 MB+1567%
L2 Cache	4 MB	72 MB+1700%
Ray Tracing Cores	60	100+67%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon RX 6800	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3	DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 4)
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 12.5% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 6800) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX 6800	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s	576 GB/s+13%
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	72 MB+1700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6800) vs 12.2 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX 6800	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6800) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).

Feature	Radeon RX 6800	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Encoder	VCN 4.0	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	VCN 4.0	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6800 draws 250W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 175W — a 35.3% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6800) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon RX 6800	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
TDP	250W	175W-30%
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	88.2	116.1+32%