G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅15.5% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌18.8% longer card at 285mm vs 240mm.

Radeon RX 6800

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($579 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Measures 240mm instead of 285mm, a 45mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon RX 6800

2020

Why buy it

✅15.5% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($579 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Measures 240mm instead of 285mm, a 45mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌18.8% longer card at 285mm vs 240mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon RX 6800?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 15.5% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data, 43.2% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2020, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020, 43.2% more raw performance headroom, the stronger feature stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation instead of FSR 3 + AFMF, and a 4nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about 38.0% more expensive on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $579 MSRP, and you are getting 15.5% more estimated average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data and 43.2% higher G3D Mark. It only holds a slight 3.8% edge in G3D-per-dollar, so the value lead is real but narrow. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon RX 6800 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon RX 6800 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $579 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6800 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6800
1080p
low	188 FPS	221 FPS
medium	171 FPS	203 FPS
high	155 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	161 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	200 FPS
medium	125 FPS	167 FPS
high	111 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	129 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	135 FPS
medium	79 FPS	114 FPS
high	66 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	83 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon RX 6800

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6800
1080p
low	664 FPS	508 FPS
medium	539 FPS	436 FPS
high	415 FPS	346 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	295 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	338 FPS
medium	400 FPS	283 FPS
high	329 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	189 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	144 FPS
medium	211 FPS	124 FPS
high	187 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	84 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon RX 6800

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6800
1080p
low	921 FPS	901 FPS
medium	742 FPS	734 FPS
high	652 FPS	637 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	496 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	691 FPS
medium	578 FPS	557 FPS
high	497 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	372 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	482 FPS
medium	403 FPS	391 FPS
high	352 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	248 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon RX 6800

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6800
1080p
low	879 FPS	641 FPS
medium	731 FPS	547 FPS
high	664 FPS	481 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	434 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	536 FPS
medium	585 FPS	462 FPS
high	514 FPS	395 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	349 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	343 FPS
medium	408 FPS	306 FPS
high	366 FPS	276 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	243 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon RX 6800

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon RX 6800

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 6800

The Radeon RX 6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,056 points. Launch price was $579.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon RX 6800's 22,056 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 43.2%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 6800). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2105 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 60 (Radeon RX 6800) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6800
G3D Mark Score	31,578+43%	22,056
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	4 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	7680+100%	3840
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+148%	16.17 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+24%	2105 MHz
ROPs	80	96+20%
TMUs	240	240
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+900%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+1100%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	60	60

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6800 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6800
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6800 has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 6800 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800) — a 1.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 6800. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6800) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6800
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	16 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	512 GB/s+2%
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	48 MB+1100%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6800
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6800). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6800
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon RX 6800's 250W — a 13.1% difference. The Radeon RX 6800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6800). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6800
TDP	285W	250W-12%
Recommended PSU	700W	650W-7%
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	285mm	240mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	110.8+26%	88.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6800 launched at $579. The Radeon RX 6800 costs 27.5% less ($220 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 38.1 (Radeon RX 6800) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 3.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).