
Radeon RX 6800
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 6800
2020Why buy it
- ✅29.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 260mm, a 20mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌65.9% HIGHER MSRP$579 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.1 vs 58.3 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 160W.
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 53.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.3 vs 38.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 250W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon RX 6800
2020Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
2025Why buy it
- ✅29.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 260mm, a 20mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 53.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.3 vs 38.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 250W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌65.9% HIGHER MSRP$579 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.1 vs 58.3 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 160W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6800 better than Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB make more sense than Radeon RX 6800?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6800 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6800 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 346 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 6800 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 901 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 734 FPS | 698 FPS |
| high | 637 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 691 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 528 FPS |
| high | 471 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 372 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 391 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 6800 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 641 FPS | 694 FPS |
| medium | 547 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 481 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 462 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 229 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6800 and Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

Radeon RX 6800
Radeon RX 6800
The Radeon RX 6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,056 points. Launch price was $579.

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 3130 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,352 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6800 scores 22,056 versus the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB's 20,352 — the Radeon RX 6800 leads by 8.4%. The Radeon RX 6800 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB uses RDNA 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon RX 6800) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB). Raw compute: 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800) vs 25.64 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB). Boost clocks: 2105 MHz vs 3130 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon RX 6800) vs 32 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,056+8% | 20,352 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+88% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.17 TFLOPS | 25.64 TFLOPS+59% |
| Boost Clock | 2105 MHz | 3130 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 + AFMF | FSR Upscaling + Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+88% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is on a newer tier with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1, while the Radeon RX 6800 tops out at FSR Frame Generation + AFMF.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) — a 60% advantage for the Radeon RX 6800. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+60% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6800) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6800) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6800 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB's 160W — a 43.9% difference. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6800) vs 550W (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 260mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 78.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 160W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 260mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-4% | 78 |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 127.2+44% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6800 launched at $579 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB launched at $349. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB costs 39.7% less ($230 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.1 (Radeon RX 6800) vs 58.3 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) — the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB offers 53% better value. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $579 | $349-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.1 | 58.3+53% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Navi 44 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | June 4 2025 |
| Ranking | #65 | #77 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












