
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅6.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 38.1 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 6800
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌16% HIGHER MSRP$579 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.1 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Radeon RX 6800
2020Why buy it
- ✅6.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 38.1 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌16% HIGHER MSRP$579 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.1 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB better than Radeon RX 6800?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6800 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 83 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 84 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 888 FPS | 901 FPS |
| medium | 716 FPS | 734 FPS |
| high | 628 FPS | 637 FPS |
| ultra | 511 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 676 FPS | 691 FPS |
| medium | 537 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 547 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 243 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and Radeon RX 6800

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon RX 6800
Radeon RX 6800
The Radeon RX 6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,056 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB scores 22,713 and the Radeon RX 6800 reaches 22,056 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 6800). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2105 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 60 (Radeon RX 6800) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,713+3% | 22,056 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+13% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+36% | 16.17 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+20% | 2105 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 240+76% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+473% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 60+76% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6800 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800) — a 77.8% advantage for the Radeon RX 6800. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6800) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 512 GB/s+78% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6800). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws 165W versus the Radeon RX 6800's 250W — a 41% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6800). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 240mm, occupying 2.2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W-34% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2.2 | 2-9% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 137.7+56% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6800 launched at $579. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB costs 13.8% less ($80 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 38.1 (Radeon RX 6800) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 19.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-14% | $579 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.5+19% | 38.1 |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 21 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #56 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












