
Radeon RX 6650M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6700S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 6650M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 31.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.
Radeon RX 6700S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 6650M
2022Radeon RX 6700S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 31.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6650M better than Radeon RX 6700S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6700S still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6650M | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6650M | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 50 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 6650M | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 683 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 6650M | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 423 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 389 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6650M and Radeon RX 6700S

Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M
The Radeon RX 6650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,171 points.

Radeon RX 6700S
Radeon RX 6700S
The Radeon RX 6700S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,061 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6650M scores 15,171 and the Radeon RX 6700S reaches 15,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6650M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6700S uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 6650M) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6700S). Raw compute: 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700S). Boost clocks: 2416 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 6650M) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6700S).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,171 | 15,061 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.659 TFLOPS+21% | 7.168 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2416 MHz+21% | 2000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 + AFMF | FSR 3 + AFMF |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6650M) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6700S). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6650M) vs RDNA 2 Media Engine (Radeon RX 6700S). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6650M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700S).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | RDNA 2 Media Engine |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6650M draws 120W versus the Radeon RX 6700S's 80W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 6700S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6650M) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6700S). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 80W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.4 | 188.3+49% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












