G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅55.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 10 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌111.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 135W.

Radeon RX 6700M

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 135W instead of 285W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon RX 6700M

2021

Why buy it

✅55.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 10 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 135W instead of 285W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌111.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 135W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon RX 6700M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti averages 55.8% more FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 13,525 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon RX 6700M is a 2021 model from an older upper-mid-range class with FSR 3 + AFMF. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021, 133.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 10 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation instead of FSR 3 + AFMF. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $799 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 55.8% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 133.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon RX 6700M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon RX 6700M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6700M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6700M
1080p
low	188 FPS	164 FPS
medium	171 FPS	146 FPS
high	155 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	138 FPS
medium	125 FPS	112 FPS
high	111 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	89 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	84 FPS
medium	79 FPS	70 FPS
high	66 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	48 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon RX 6700M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6700M
1080p
low	664 FPS	392 FPS
medium	539 FPS	329 FPS
high	415 FPS	269 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	223 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	255 FPS
medium	400 FPS	213 FPS
high	329 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	144 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	120 FPS
medium	211 FPS	103 FPS
high	187 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	63 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon RX 6700M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6700M
1080p
low	921 FPS	609 FPS
medium	742 FPS	487 FPS
high	652 FPS	406 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	304 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	456 FPS
medium	578 FPS	365 FPS
high	497 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	228 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	304 FPS
medium	403 FPS	243 FPS
high	352 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	152 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon RX 6700M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6700M
1080p
low	879 FPS	609 FPS
medium	731 FPS	487 FPS
high	664 FPS	406 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	304 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	456 FPS
medium	585 FPS	365 FPS
high	514 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	228 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	291 FPS
medium	408 FPS	243 FPS
high	366 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	152 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon RX 6700M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon RX 6700M

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 6700M

The Radeon RX 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1489 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 135W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,525 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon RX 6700M's 13,525 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 133.5%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6700M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700M). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700M). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 36 (Radeon RX 6700M) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6700M
G3D Mark Score	31,578+133%	13,525
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	4 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	7680+233%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+262%	11.06 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+9%	2400 MHz
ROPs	80+25%	64
TMUs	240+67%	144
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+1400%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+1500%	3 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	60+67%	36

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6700M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6700M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700M has 10 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 20% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700M) — a 57.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6700M
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+20%	10 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s+57%	320 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+20%	160-bit
L2 Cache	48 MB+1500%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6700M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6700M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6700M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6700M
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	VCN 3.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon RX 6700M's 135W — a 71.4% difference. The Radeon RX 6700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6700M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 285mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon RX 6700M
TDP	285W	135W-53%
Recommended PSU	700W	500W-29%
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	285mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	110.8+11%	100.2